Consumer confidence took a hit in early May, but the depth of the damage depends heavily on which measuring stick you use. The Conference Board reported a modest decline while the University of Michigan survey hit historic lows, creating competing narratives about how badly Americans feel about their economic prospects.
The Conference Board's index slipped 0.7 percentage points to 93.1, a pullback that still leaves sentiment above January levels. Future expectations actually ticked up slightly, partially offsetting weakened views of current conditions. The real story lay in what consumers were talking about: mentions of prices, oil, and gas surged for a second straight month, while references to war, geopolitics, and conflict remained persistently high.
The Michigan survey painted a far starker picture, plunging to readings unseen in decades. Both measures point in the same direction, signaling that households are genuinely worried about their budgets as energy prices spike and geopolitical tensions bite into purchasing power.
Yet the dramatic divergence between the two surveys reveals something important about how we measure confidence itself. The Michigan gauge places heavy weight on purchasing power and financial conditions, categories that have absorbed relentless pressure from inflation in recent years. The Conference Board, by contrast, tilts its questions toward labor market health, an area that has remained surprisingly resilient despite some recent hiring slowdowns.
The timing of the Conference Board's survey cutoff on May 19 mattered too. The data captured a period when Middle East tensions were actively driving up global energy costs, though optimism around an Iran deal would emerge in the days that followed. The divergence between what the two surveys are actually measuring and when they measure it underscores a broader challenge in assessing consumer mood: the same economic moment can feel radically different depending on which financial pressures you're most worried about.
For policymakers and investors watching for signs of economic deterioration, the real signal is directional consistency. Both surveys agree that consumers are downgrading their outlook. Whether that pessimism reaches unprecedented depths or remains within a recent range may ultimately matter less than the fact that Americans across multiple measurement approaches are expressing genuine anxiety about where their paychecks go.
Author James Rodriguez: "When your two most trusted barometers give conflicting readings, the smart move is to trust that something real is bothering consumers, even if you can't quite nail down how worried they should be."
Comments