Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who died Saturday at 71 after a brief illness, spent nearly a quarter-century threading the needle between partisan warfare and legislative compromise, a balancing act that defined his outsized influence over some of Congress's most consequential battles.
His final act in the Senate encapsulated that role perfectly. The day before his death, Graham helped broker a bipartisan agreement with the Trump administration on Russia sanctions. He was in Ukraine at the time, briefing President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the details of a bill designed to punish countries importing Russian oil and gas.
Earlier this year, as Democrats and Republicans deadlocked over a government shutdown that had crippled the Department of Homeland Security, Graham announced his budget committee would move forward on funding for Trump's mass deportation priorities. That single statement from the chairman helped crack the impasse and reunited fractious Senate Republicans behind a spending package.
It was the kind of move that colored Graham's entire Senate career. "Lindsey was part of every important policy issue and an indispensable player in every Senate 'gang,'" Dick Durbin, the number two Senate Democrat, said after his death. "He was a fierce Republican partisan one day and a key bipartisan ally the next."
Graham served four terms in the House before winning his Senate seat in 2002. He entered Congress as a foreign policy hawk and remained one throughout his career, supporting the 2003 Iraq invasion and the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay under George W. Bush. But that same hawkishness periodically pushed him across the aisle, particularly on issues involving American military commitments abroad.
Under Bush, he partnered with Democratic icon Ted Kennedy on failed immigration reform efforts and joined the bipartisan "gang of 14" that resolved a judicial confirmation standoff. Years later, he was part of the "gang of eight" that attempted another immigration overhaul. He negotiated climate change agreements with Democrats under Barack Obama, though those talks ultimately collapsed.
His Supreme Court voting record revealed the complexity of his position. Graham voted to confirm every Supreme Court nominee from both Bush and Trump, supported two of Obama's picks, but opposed Biden's nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson. In 2022, he was among only 15 Republicans who voted for modest gun violence prevention measures following the Uvalde school shooting.
When Trump returned to the White House, Graham's chairmanship of the budget committee made him essential to passing legislation funding the president's domestic agenda, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Yet his foreign policy convictions sometimes diverged from Trump's instincts. While the president wavered on Ukraine, Graham consistently advocated for robust American support, including visits to Kyiv to meet with Zelenskyy. He backed NATO despite Trump's skepticism of the alliance and joined Democrat Richard Blumenthal on sanctions legislation targeting Syria.
Graham also championed Trump's hawkish military decisions, enthusiastically supporting the Iran campaign and a commando raid that resulted in Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro's capture earlier this year.
The dualities in Graham's record frustrated both parties at different times. His transformation from Trump critic in 2016 to staunch ally overshadowed his legislative achievements for many observers. He played a key role in Senate Republicans' effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act and participated in post-2020 election challenges to Biden's victory. Those moves defined him for critics as a partisan operator.
But colleagues across the aisle pointed to substantive collaborations. Democratic senator Chris Coons, who had dinner with Graham during last week's NATO summit in Turkey to celebrate his birthday, credited him with shepherding major bills on African conservation and fragile state engagement. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, recalled Graham's skill at herding Republican senators into line during contentious lunch meetings.
Graham's approach worked because he genuinely believed in the issues he negotiated, not because he was simply splitting differences. His foreign policy views were ideologically consistent, even when they put him at odds with his party's leader. His willingness to work with Democrats on those priorities, and occasionally on domestic issues, reflected conviction rather than expedience.
Author James Rodriguez: "Graham's death removes one of the few remaining senators who could operate effectively across party lines without apology, a skill that has grown rarer and more valuable in an increasingly polarized chamber."
Comments