Khanna reverses course, admits backing wrong candidate for Senate seat

Khanna reverses course, admits backing wrong candidate for Senate seat

Rep. Ro Khanna has walked back his endorsement of Graham Platner, conceding that his decision to support the candidate was a mistake.

The California Democrat's reversal marks a significant shift in the race, coming after mounting pressure on Platner to exit the contest. Khanna's initial backing had lent credibility to the candidate, but fresh developments prompted the congressman to reconsider his position.

"I got that call wrong," Khanna said in a forthright admission about his endorsement decision.

Khanna's turnabout reflects broader concern among Democratic circles about whether Platner could remain viable in a competitive race. Multiple party figures have raised alarms about the candidacy, with some suggesting that his continued presence on the ballot could jeopardize the seat entirely. The congressional landscape has shifted rapidly as details emerged that made his nomination increasingly problematic for party strategists.

The endorsement had been viewed as a signal of support from a younger, reform-minded Democratic wing. Its withdrawal suggests that even those who had championed Platner now see the race differently. Other Democratic leaders have also publicly urged Platner to step aside, framing the decision as essential to protecting the party's chances in what was expected to be a closely contested battle.

Khanna's reversal underscores the fluidity of political calculations in the current cycle. What appeared to be a sound strategic choice weeks earlier had become untenable as new information surfaced and concern grew within the party establishment.

The race remains unsettled, with Democratic operatives divided on the path forward and uncertainty hanging over whether Platner will ultimately stay in the contest.

Author Sarah Mitchell: "Khanna's about-face reveals how quickly political judgments can unravel when a candidate's vulnerabilities become undeniable."

Comments