The supposed ceasefire in Lebanon is disintegrating. On Tuesday alone, Israeli strikes killed 31 people. By Wednesday, the military ordered the evacuation of Tyre, the country's fourth-largest city. Israeli troops have moved beyond the buffer zone they established in the south, a move far-right ministers in Netanyahu's government want to cement through annexation.
Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to "crush" Hezbollah as the offensive accelerated, suggesting either a bid to destabilize ongoing peace talks or an attempt to rack up military gains before U.S. pressure forces a halt. The domestic political calculus is clear: war shields Netanyahu from accountability at home while satisfying Israeli demands for continued operations against Hezbollah's drone threat.
The human toll has been staggering. Israel has killed thousands, including civilians and medics, while demolishing or heavily damaging bridges, water systems, and homes. An estimated 1.2 million people have fled. Researchers at Bellingcat documented that at least 46 of 54 villages within Israel's designated "yellow line" have been either razed or severely damaged using tactics mirrored in Gaza. Many have nowhere to return.
Yet Lebanon barely registers on the world's radar. While Iran's posture and ongoing Gaza violence command global attention, the systematic destruction unfolding in Lebanon proceeds with minimal international scrutiny. Perhaps the sheer scale of violence elsewhere has made breaching the laws of war feel routine. But there is nothing routine about what is happening here.
Washington is pushing Lebanon into direct negotiations with Israel, a fraught position for a state already fractured by decades of conflict. Hezbollah triggered this war, and many Lebanese blame the group for inviting Israeli retaliation. Yet others view Hezbollah, born from Israeli occupation, as a necessary counterweight the Lebanese state cannot provide. That tension is tearing the country apart.
Political divisions are sharpening along sectarian lines. Some Lebanese are actively avoiding Shia communities perceived as Israeli targets. In a nation already scarred by civil war, economic collapse, and the 2020 Beirut port explosion, competition for dwindling resources is intensifying old grievances. The risk of renewed civil conflict is no longer theoretical.
Sami Halabi, director of policy at the Lebanese thinktank Badil, captured the contradiction plainly. Washington claims it wants a stronger Lebanese state and a weaker Hezbollah, he wrote, yet its actions suggest something darker: managing Lebanon's fracture under Israeli military control rather than building genuine sovereignty. A better Lebanon is conceivable. It cannot emerge from this rubble.
Author James Rodriguez: "The world's indifference to Lebanon's suffering while obsessing over every detail of Iran diplomacy is a telling failure of attention."
Comments