President Trump's political victories on the campaign trail are colliding hard with legislative reality on Capitol Hill, where Republicans are mounting a quiet but determined revolt over his spending priorities.
The flashpoint is a nearly $1.8 billion carveout labeled as an "anti-weaponization" fund, which House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House championed as part of broader spending negotiations. But GOP lawmakers in both chambers are treating it as radioactive, with some openly discussing ways to strip it out or impose strict limits on how it can be spent.
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania put it bluntly, saying he will "try to kill" the fund entirely. Rep. Kevin Kiley of California indicated he would likely sign onto a discharge petition that could force a vote to restrict it. Even outgoing Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana called it a "$1.8 billion fund for the President and his allies to pay whomever they wish with no legal precedent or accountability."
During a closed-door Senate Republican lunch this week, lawmakers hammered home their concerns about where the money originates and who can receive it. Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota acknowledged that "there's going to be an attempt to address the questions that are out there on it," with amendments coming from Republicans themselves rather than Democrats.
The rebellion extends beyond the anti-weaponization fund. House Democrats are moving closer to a successful vote on rebuking Trump over Iran war powers, with their last holdout reportedly ready to flip. At least one Republican has signaled openness to joining the effort.
Johnson attempted to tamp down the unrest on Wednesday, telling reporters that lawmakers should not be "trying to carve out their own lane and do something that's destructive" and must sometimes "give up your personal preferences" in a "deliberative body."
His members aren't buying the pitch. Retiring Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska shot back that a "yes-man mentality" serves no one: "It's not good for the president, it's not good for our party, not good for Congress." Fitzpatrick, who has faced Trump criticism for failing to toe the line, dismissed concerns about a primary challenge and said Trump should make his case rather than issue threats.
The immediate legislative battle centers on a roughly $70 billion package to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol for three and a half years. Senate Republican leaders were expected to release the bill's text this week, with lawmakers signaling that vote-a-rama proceedings could begin as soon as Thursday. Democrats are preparing amendments aimed directly at restricting what they are calling the "slush fund."
For Trump, the week contained campaign wins: he successfully backed candidates in primary contests and settled political scores. But on the legislative scorecard, momentum is shifting against him.
Author James Rodriguez: "Republicans taking a stand on spending discipline may finally be the check Trump never quite faced before."
Comments