The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee ignited a firestorm Monday by throwing its weight behind multiple candidates still battling in contested primaries, prompting rare public complaints from within the party's own ranks and reigniting a fundamental debate about how nominees should be chosen.
The committee announced eight new endorsements as part of its "Red to Blue" program, which funnels resources and fundraising support to Democrats positioned to challenge Republican incumbents. Five of the eight endorsed candidates face primary opposition from fellow Democrats, a move that quickly drew criticism from progressive groups and sitting House members.
The Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC fired back sharply. "Voters, not the DCCC, should pick Democratic nominees," the group said in a statement. The criticism extended into other corners of the party. Rep. Linda Sánchez, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus' BOLD PAC, bristled at Latino candidates being overlooked, declaring that Latino voters and candidates "are not a small factor in the fight for the House majority; they are central to it."
What triggered the loudest objections were some of the specific choices. In California's 22nd district, the committee backed Jasmeet Bains, a state assembly member, despite progressive candidate Randy Villegas outraising her. The race has become ideological theater for competing Democratic factions. In Pennsylvania's 7th district, firefighter Bob Brooks received the endorsement even though three other well-funded primary opponents are competing for the same nomination.
Most puzzling to some Democrats was the Arizona 1st district endorsement of former broadcast journalist Marlene Galán-Woods, passed over in favor of former state representative Amish Shah in a previous cycle. Shah won that earlier primary.
Several House Democrats, speaking anonymously to avoid public conflict, expressed bewilderment at the selections. One lawmaker said they have "pretty strong feelings" against the Brooks endorsement and have "spoken with a number of colleagues who are also really upset." That same member suggested the DCCC owed the caucus an explanation and predicted some members might suspend their donations to the committee in protest.
Another Democrat called the Bains pick "pretty surprising" given that Villegas has more endorsements from current House members and enjoys broader support. A third questioned the logic behind elevating Galán-Woods, noting that Shah appears to be the stronger candidate heading into this cycle.
Outside groups joined the pile-on. David Hogg, co-founder of Leaders We Deserve, accused the committee of "wasting resources in primaries to prop up weak candidates." Ravi Mangla, a spokesperson for the Working Families Party, argued the Democratic establishment was "putting its thumb on the scale, not to support the stronger candidate, but the candidate who will bend to party leadership."
The DCCC defended the moves, with spokesperson Viet Shelton insisting the endorsed candidates "span the ideological spectrum" and are "best positioned to win in November." A source close to the committee's decision-making said lawmakers had been notified in advance and the reasoning explained to them. The source also pushed back on the idea that the committee was breaking any rules, noting it has long maintained the right to weigh in on competitive primaries without adhering to strict neutrality.
DCCC chair Suzan DelBene acknowledged last fall that the committee gets involved in a "small number of cases" in contested primaries, but she suggested such interventions are exceptions rather than the norm.
One candidate passed over for endorsement downplayed the risk. Lamont McClure, competing in Pennsylvania's 7th district, told Axios he won't hold a grudge if party leadership fails to back him now. "When I am our nominee and [GOP Rep. Ryan Mackenzie] is toast, I think the DCCC and all its members will be really happy about that," he said.
Author James Rodriguez: "The DCCC's habit of picking winners before voters get a say contradicts everything Democrats claim to believe about democracy, and the backlash shows the party can't paper over that hypocrisy with talk about electability."
Comments