Rachel Fulton was overjoyed when she learned she was pregnant with her second child. Then a routine ultrasound shattered that joy. At 12 weeks, doctors discovered cystic hygroma, a condition in which fluid had gathered where her baby's heart should have been developing.
The Fultons held onto hope. They decorated the nursery with a Peanuts theme and chose a name: Titus Claude. But four weeks later, a follow-up scan delivered devastating news. The condition was worsening, and the baby would not survive long after birth. Worse still, Fulton herself faced a serious threat. She could develop mirror syndrome, a potentially deadly complication that occurs when a mother's body reacts to severe fetal abnormalities.
Her options, as spelled out by her maternal-fetal physician, were stark and cruel: leave Tennessee to end the pregnancy, wait until she was in mortal danger, or wait until her baby died inside her. Only then could she access abortion care in her home state, where the procedure is banned except for narrow circumstances involving threats to the mother's life.
"It made a terrible situation so much worse," Fulton said. "I had no good options. I at least wanted the least-bad option to be with a doctor who has already seen me and is familiar with my medical history."
The Fultons made the grueling decision to travel. They drove eight hours to St. Louis to stay with family, then another two or three hours into Illinois to find a doctor who could provide the care Fulton needed. She returned home desperate for her three-year-old son, haunted by memories of her paternal grandmother, who had died in childbirth decades earlier, leaving seven orphaned children behind.
"I didn't want to do that to my son," Fulton said.
Her story might have ended there, a private tragedy in a red state enforcing one of the nation's strictest abortion restrictions. But Fulton decided to fight back. When she learned the Center for Reproductive Rights was suing Tennessee over its ban, she joined as a plaintiff, transforming her personal crisis into a legal battle.
"If I could stop people from being in the medical position that I was in, I would, but I can't," she said. "When I do anything with this case, as hard as it is, I am doing it to help other people and I'm doing it for Titus."
The lawsuit brought together six patients, two physicians, and the American Medical Association, all challenging the state's abortion restrictions on the grounds that they violate fundamental rights and endanger women's health. Four of the patient plaintiffs, like Fulton, carried fetuses with lethal diagnoses that threatened their own lives. Two others developed severe infections after being denied reproductive healthcare they needed.
The trial was set to begin on Monday. Then Tennessee's attorney general, Jonathan Skrmetti, filed a last-minute appeal that halted the proceedings indefinitely.
Linda Goldstein, the lead attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said the delay was a strategy to silence these women. "What the state is trying to do by this delay is prevent these women from telling their story in court," she said. "The state wants to convince the people of Tennessee that the abortion ban is working and that women who need medically necessary abortion care are getting it."
The evidence tells a different story. Goldstein pointed to cases of women getting infected or going septic because doctors feared legal consequences for providing standard medical treatment they had routinely offered before the ban took effect.
"An overwhelming majority of Americans want women to be able to get abortion care when their lives or health are threatened, and there are these exceptions written into the law that the politicians tout as doing that, but in fact, they don't," Goldstein said.
Skrmetti defended the appeal in a statement to the Guardian, saying there was "nothing unusual about appealing an appealable order" and expressing confidence that "the Tennessee judiciary can resolve the legal issues here without a trial."
For Fulton, the delay is another wound. She has waited months for her day in court, hoping to give voice not just to her own suffering but to the families across Tennessee facing similar impossible choices. Every week the trial is postponed, she said, more families endure the same pain she did.
"I'm just hoping I still get my day in court, I get to tell my story, I get to speak for other women, other families, in situations like ours," she said.
Author James Rodriguez: "Fulton's case exposes the real-world cruelty behind abortion bans dressed up as having life-saving exceptions, and the state's desperate legal maneuvering shows it knows exactly what's at stake when women finally get to testify."
Comments