President Trump's use of the pardon power has diverted at least $113 million in fines and penalties away from victim services, according to reporting shared with the Guardian. The 117 pardons issued during his second term eliminated funds that would have supported shelters for domestic violence survivors, rape crisis centers, and child abuse treatment programs.
The slate of recipients reveals a pattern: wealthy offenders, cryptocurrency executives, and international figures with high-priced legal representation. Among them is Juan Orlando Hernández, the former Honduran president convicted of cocaine trafficking conspiracy. A shadow industry of lobbyists charges $1 million or more to secure clemency for the connected and affluent.
The impact on vulnerable populations is immediate and tangible. Shelters, crisis centers, and treatment programs now operate with reduced budgets while caseloads remain steady. The cost of mercy, as structured, falls on those least able to absorb it.
Maryland Congressman Johnny Olszewski is pushing back with constitutional machinery. Working with Republican colleague Don Bacon, he is advancing the Pardon Integrity Act, a constitutional amendment designed to inject Congressional review into the clemency process.
The mechanism is narrow by design. If 20 House members and five senators challenge a pardon, Congress votes within 60 days. Overturning a pardon requires a two-thirds supermajority in both chambers. The high threshold protects legitimate executive clemency while creating a brake on what Olszewski describes as clear abuses.
Olszewski is explicit that this transcends partisan lines. He cites Bill Clinton's pardon of his half-brother following a drug conviction and Joe Biden's clemency for his son and preemptive pardons as equally problematic. The amendment frames pardon accountability as a structural democracy issue, not a partisan cudgel.
The Framers built checks and balances into the Constitution precisely because they distrusted unchecked power. The pardon stands as one of the few remaining domains where presidential authority operates unilaterally. An amendment restores a measure of transparency and prevents what Olszewski calls the perversion of mercy into a transactional reward for loyalty and wealth.
Constitutional amendment is a grinding process. It demands consensus and staying power. But the calculus here is straightforward: victim services hemorrhaging funds because presidential friends face no financial consequences to pardon is a break in the system worth fixing.
Author James Rodriguez: "Pardon shopping at a million dollars a head while crime victims lose shelter funding is governance failure, and it takes courage from both sides to admit it."
Comments