The McDonald's cheeseburger has become a cultural punching bag, criticized for everything from nutritional content to corporate practices. But there's a stubborn economic reality that defenders of the burger keep circling back to: adjusted for wage growth and purchasing power, the sandwich has actually grown cheaper over the decades.
When you measure the price of a cheeseburger against the hourly earnings of workers in 1948, the burger required less work time to earn than it does today. The gap between wages and menu prices has shifted in the burger's favor, making it more accessible on a per-dollar basis than it was three quarters of a century ago.
That calculation cuts against the grain of popular perception. Diners regularly complain about rising fast food costs, and the complaints are not baseless. Nominal prices have climbed. But when economists factor in wage growth over time, the picture becomes more nuanced.
The observation does not settle debates about whether Americans should be eating cheeseburgers or about McDonald's labor practices and business model. It simply highlights a counterintuitive fact: the iconic sandwich has become a more affordable item in the American diet than it was in the postwar era, at least when measured against what workers earned.
For a restaurant chain that has built its empire on the promise of affordable food, the data suggests that promise has actually held up better than most institutional products have managed over the same stretch of time.
Author James Rodriguez: "The cheeseburger's real cost has dropped while everything else got more expensive, which says something about fast food's stubborn grip on the American wallet."
Comments