The Democratic National Committee's Rules and Bylaws Committee voted Friday to give South Carolina the opening slot in the 2028 presidential primary calendar, passing over Nevada in a decision that exposed deep fractures within the party over which voters should have first say in picking its nominee.
The preliminary decision, which still requires approval from the full DNC, represents a win for Black party leaders who argued that their voters, who comprise a significant portion of South Carolina's electorate, have earned the right to cast the first ballots. The debate was anything but smooth, pitting regional interests and demographic priorities against one another in ways that revealed simmering tensions within Democratic ranks.
"To turn around now and push South Carolina to the back of the line would be a slap in the face to the very voters who've kept this party alive," said Rev. Al Sharpton, the civil rights leader, in public remarks ahead of the vote.
Christale Spain, chair of South Carolina's Democratic Party, framed the choice in starker terms. "If Nevada gets elevated over South Carolina, it would be because of their Latino vote," she told The New York Times. "So you would then be telling Black voters that you matter less than brown voters."
Latino Democratic leaders had mounted their own case for Nevada, emphasizing that state's substantial Latino and working-class populations, both crucial constituencies in general elections. The deliberations extended late into Thursday night, with sources telling Axios the outcome remained genuinely uncertain until Friday morning.
The stakes are enormous. The first primary contest typically wields outsized influence over the race, generating media attention and campaign resources that can make or break candidacies before voters in other states ever cast a ballot. Small, diverse states theoretically allow contenders to compete effectively without massive advertising budgets.
The committee's rationale for South Carolina centered on these practical advantages. But the decision carries political weight beyond procedural arguments. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is considering another presidential bid, currently leads among Black voters in early 2028 polling, making South Carolina's positioning potentially consequential for her campaign.
South Carolina held the opening position in 2024 after then-President Biden pushed for that arrangement. The state's Black voters delivered decisive support to his campaign that year, and party leaders argued that rewarding that loyalty was both politically prudent and fair.
The committee's decision does not end the calendar wars. New Hampshire has a state law requiring it to hold the nation's first primary, a provision that has created friction with national Democrats before. Iowa, meanwhile, faces a more fluid situation, though some Democrats have signaled willingness to run an unsanctioned caucus to preserve the state's traditional early role.
The DNC recently tightened penalties for state parties that defy the national calendar, making rogue contests riskier than in the past. Whether that enforcement mechanism proves sufficient to keep New Hampshire and Iowa in line remains to be seen.
Author James Rodriguez: "This vote was never really about which state has the most appealing voters, it was about which coalition had the leverage to win, and Black Democrats made clear they weren't backing down."
Comments