The Republican-controlled House narrowly approved its annual defense policy bill Wednesday, but the vote exposed deep partisan fractures over military spending, the Iran conflict, and voting restrictions tied to the legislation.
The National Defense Authorization Act passed 216-212, with only six Democrats breaking ranks to support it while seven Republicans voted against it. The bill now heads to the Senate, where Democrats have already signaled resistance.
The NDAA traditionally sails through Congress with strong bipartisan support, but this year's version became entangled in disputes that transformed it into a flashpoint for Republican culture-war priorities. The bill includes military pay raises of 5-7%, renames the Pentagon the Department of War, and represents President Trump's push to allocate $1.5 trillion to defense spending in fiscal 2027.
House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers framed the spending as overdue. "For the first time in 40 years, we've been presented a budget that accounts for the true cost of American deterrence," Rogers said before the vote. "This topline begins to reverse the damage caused by decades of underinvestment in the US military."
Democrats objected on multiple grounds. Speaker Mike Johnson inserted the Save America Act into the bill, a Trump-backed proposal to ban mail-in ballots and impose stricter voter ID requirements. That move infuriated Democrats, who saw it as weaponizing defense legislation for partisan gain.
The timing proved particularly combustible because Trump ordered U.S. forces to join Israel in attacking Iran last week without first requesting congressional authorization. The military strikes followed the collapse of a diplomatic memorandum intended to jump-start peace negotiations. Senate Democrats blocked their chamber's version of the NDAA to protest the unilateral military action.
Rosa DeLauro, the top Democratic appropriator, expressed her frustration plainly. "The annual NDAA used to be a consistently bipartisan, substantive piece of legislation," she said. "I am disappointed that under Republican leadership, it has become just another partisan bill that is written to satisfy the most extreme Republican voices rather than a serious, nonpolitical framework for our national defense."
Democratic objections went beyond voting rules and the Iran strikes. Adam Smith, the ranking Democrat on the armed services panel, voted to advance the bill from committee but opposed it on the House floor, citing "toxic, partisan amendments that continue the rightwing culture war assault on the LGBTQ+ community and preempt state and local laws under the guise of military readiness." He also objected to the overall scale of military spending while other federal programs face cuts.
The legislation included provisions deepening U.S.-Israel defense cooperation, which drew fire from progressive lawmakers. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called one such amendment "an existential threat to American sovereignty and democracy."
The House debated dozens of amendments, with some revealing stark divides. An attempt by Republican Eli Crane to cut all military aid to Ukraine failed overwhelmingly, 76-350. But the chamber did embrace amendments from Republican Nancy Mace barring military health insurance from covering certain gender-related medical care and banning transgender athletes from girls' sports at Pentagon-run schools.
An amendment from Representative Lauren Boebert to codify Trump's ban on transgender military service narrowly fell short, failing 212-217.
Separately, House Republicans approved a budget blueprint authorizing $73 billion for the Iran war while bypassing the Democratic filibuster in the Senate. The figure falls well short of the Pentagon's initial $350 billion request needed to reach the full $1.5 trillion defense target.
Author James Rodriguez: "What was once the most reliably bipartisan vote in Congress has become just another brawl between the parties, and that's a problem when national security is the price of political score-settling."
Comments