Meta's smart glasses come with a built-in camera and what the company calls safety features. But women have reported being recorded without consent, with footage later posted to social media or used for extortion. Some say they saw no warning light when being filmed, despite Meta's claim that an LED indicator activates during recording.
The glasses represent a troubling collision of consumer technology and personal safety. Men have uploaded videos of women without permission, turning everyday interactions into content for platforms like TikTok and Instagram. Some women reported being recorded during intimate moments. Others described receiving demands for money to have videos removed from social media.
Meta's response has been to emphasize technical safeguards. The company told CNN that the glasses feature an LED light that signals when recording occurs, along with tamper detection to prevent users from covering the indicator. Yet women who spoke to CNN about their experiences said they never saw a flashing light during the encounters in question.
The company's safety guidelines prohibit using the glasses for harassment or capturing sensitive information. But enforcement remains unclear, and some users on social media have posted instructions on bypassing the light safeguard. Meta has since updated the device in response.
The privacy threats extend beyond individual misuse. According to reporting from Wired, Meta embedded face-recognition technology into its AI app for the smart glasses. The feature, called NameTag internally, identifies people captured by the camera and can alert the wearer to recognized individuals. The underlying AI models are capable of detecting and cropping faces, then converting them into biometric data that could be weaponized by stalkers or government agencies.
Despite these concerns, Meta has enlisted celebrities to promote the technology. Kylie Jenner is among the latest high-profile endorsers, lending her influence to the product even as women report harassment enabled by the glasses. The strategy appears designed to normalize the technology and counteract growing backlash.
The broader danger lies in how surveillance technology becomes embedded in daily life. As wearable devices proliferate, the line between convenience and intrusion blurs. Covering your laptop camera or disabling voice assistants no longer offers meaningful protection when recording devices are built into everyday accessories. The more celebrities and influencers use and promote these tools, the less alarming they seem to the general public.
The immediate threat is clear: cameras hidden in plain sight, recording without consent. But the long-term implications cut deeper. Once biometric data can be collected and stored by commercial platforms, the potential for misuse by governments, corporations, and individuals multiplies exponentially. What starts as misogynistic videos today could become something far more sinister tomorrow.
Author James Rodriguez: "Putting a celebrity face on a product that women are already reporting as a tool for harassment is cynical marketing at best, and dangerous at worst."
Comments