The phone calls went to Gianni Infantino, FIFA's president. Donald Trump, acting on behalf of US Soccer, pushed hard to get Folarin Balogun's red card suspension lifted before the men's national team faced Belgium in the World Cup's knockout stage. Within days, it worked. The one-match ban was suspended until after the tournament, an unprecedented move during the competition itself.
The incident that triggered the suspension occurred during the USMNT's 2-0 victory over Bosnia and Herzegovina. Balogun was sent off for inadvertently stomping on an opponent's ankle while contesting possession. The red card itself was questionable, issued after video review, and has been widely criticized. US coach Mauricio Pochettino expressed frustration with the decision. Most observers agreed the Americans were unfairly penalized.
But here's where it gets complicated. Yes, Balogun is arguably the US team's best player. Yes, the ban looked harsh. And yes, many American fans were thrilled when the suspension was reversed. Yet the intervention itself has poisoned what should have been a straightforward path forward for a team that has genuinely impressed at this tournament.
Belgium coach Rudi Garcia didn't hide his anger, sarcastically noting that April Fools' Day apparently falls in July. The Belgian federation is exploring legal options. More troubling than official complaints, though, is the perception now attached to any American victory. A win against Belgium will carry an asterisk. The narrative becomes one of a team granted an unfair advantage by presidential intervention, not one earned through superior play.
FIFA's public response has been thin. Officials insist their disciplinary process cannot be influenced by outside pressure, then point vaguely to bylaws allowing the decision. But the reality is harder to ignore. Infantino and Trump have cultivated a notably close relationship over the years, one that benefits both: Trump gets the adulation he craves, and Infantino gains access to America's massive commercial market.
The broader damage extends beyond Monday's match. The USMNT arrived in the knockout round on merit, delivering three exceptional performances and one mediocre one. American soccer advocates have long fought against the stereotype that the US is a footballing backwater, that the country lacks world-class talent and competitiveness. This World Cup was proving those critics wrong. The team was winning respect, domestically and internationally, through performance.
Trump's intervention undermines that entirely. Norway coach Staale Solbakken captured it perfectly after his team's shock victory over Brazil, calling the decision a mistake and noting that even if the US wins, the game will always carry the stain of this intervention. It's bad for the sport, bad for American soccer's credibility, bad for the narrative the team has been building.
What Trump may not grasp is that he's inflicted a different kind of injustice, one far harder to reverse. The US needed to win this tournament clean. Instead, any success now comes with questions about whether it was earned or engineered. That's a burden no team should carry, and it's entirely self-imposed.
Author James Rodriguez: "Trump's meddling might have saved a player for one match, but he's potentially cost the entire country's soccer program its credibility when it matters most."
Comments