Republican congresswoman Nancy Mace introduced legislation last week aimed at blocking federal funding for what she described as transgender experiments on animals. The TRANS MICE Act, according to Mace's framing, would end the use of taxpayer dollars for what she called radical transgender-related animal research.
There is a significant problem with the premise. The research grants that sparked Mace's legislation have nothing to do with making mice transgender. Scientists working on sex hormone function studies say their work examines how hormones affect medical conditions, not gender transition in rodents.
The confusion appears to have originated with viral social media posts that mischaracterized legitimate biomedical research. Americans for Medical Progress, an organization that supports animal testing in medical research, issued a statement last year clarifying that the grants in question were being deliberately misrepresented online and in conservative political circles.
Mace, who described herself as Trump in high heels, finished last in her state's Republican primary race for governor and is leaving Congress at year's end. Her office has not responded to questions about whether she knowingly mischaracterized the research or was simply caught up in the viral misinformation.
The bill represents the latest flashpoint in Republican attacks on gender-related scientific research. The strategy mirrors Trump's repeated unsubstantiated claims that American schoolchildren are receiving gender reassignment surgeries during the school day, allegations he has repeated at campaign rallies despite no evidence supporting the claim.
Political observers expect Mace to stand by the legislation regardless of factual corrections, given the political difficulty of retreating on a bill framed around taxpayer waste. The dynamic illustrates how misinformation about science can convert into policy proposals when amplified by elected officials.
Author James Rodriguez: "If you're going to introduce a bill to stop wasteful spending, at least make sure the wasteful spending actually exists."
Comments