President Donald Trump is running an increasingly chaotic operation on Capitol Hill, and his own party is losing patience. Fresh frustrations erupted this week when Trump, speaking from France at the Group of Seven summit, abruptly ordered Senate Republicans to cancel a confirmation hearing for Jay Clayton, his pick to lead the intelligence community, and threatened to block a critical surveillance law unless lawmakers passed an election bill that has already crashed and burned multiple times.
The move blindsided Senate Majority Leader John Thune. What made it worse: Thune had engineered the whole hearing strategy to unlock Democratic support for the expired spying program and move Clayton's nomination at lightning speed. When asked why Trump would sabotage his own plan, Thune simply shook his head and said, "Good question."
This is hardly the first time in recent weeks Trump has thrown a wrench into the Senate's machinery. Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska captured the mood perfectly: "It may not be so much a different page, but he's turning it ahead without telling us about it."
The relationship between Trump and Senate Republicans, already fragile, is approaching a breaking point. Trump is using his political muscle to knock out senators in primaries, impose unrealistic demands, and repeatedly force the party into politically treacherous spots. Several Republican senators have expressed genuine confusion about the strategy, since Trump's moves actually make it harder for them to advance his own stated agenda.
"It's undermining our ability to produce the very results he wants," said retiring Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who called the Clayton postponement "a colossal mistake."
The backstory here matters. GOP leaders had pushed hard for Trump to nominate a permanent national intelligence director specifically to remove Bill Pulte, Trump's acting pick who triggered a bipartisan eruption on Capitol Hill. Pulte is a housing official and Trump loyalist with no serious national security credentials, and his appointment had Senate Republicans scrambling. Once it became clear the chamber intended to fast-track Clayton's confirmation and permanently sideline Pulte, Trump decided to tank the entire process himself.
Some of Trump's own allies admitted they have never witnessed anything like it. "I've only been in the Senate for 11 years, so no, I haven't," said Senator Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who currently runs for re-election with Trump's backing.
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton of Arkansas postponed the hearing and called the delay "regrettable," but repeatedly refused to explain Trump's reasoning. His Democratic counterpart, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, made the division crystal clear: "This is not a problem between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate. He threw a live hand grenade into this whole process."
This chaos is not an isolated incident. Trump's requests for $1 billion in ballroom security money derailed funding bills for immigration enforcement. His announcement of a $1.8 billion compensation fund for political allies stalled progress further. His choice of Pulte as acting intelligence director came days before the FISA Section 702 surveillance law expired, torching any chance of a timely deal.
Adding fuel to Republican anger was Trump's decision to endorse state Attorney General Ken Paxton against Senator John Cornyn of Texas in a primary fight. Cornyn is well-liked among his colleagues, and GOP strategists fear Paxton's candidacy will weaken Republicans' hold on the seat and hand Democrats a path to Senate control.
Much of the tension boils down to Trump's fixation on passing the SAVE America Act, a sweeping election bill designed to impose voting limits nationwide. Democrats have vowed to kill it, and it cannot reach the 60 votes required in the Senate. Most Republican senators refuse to abolish the filibuster, viewing it as a long-term shield for conservative causes. Trump has also demanded that Republicans fire the parliamentarian, the Senate's neutral umpire, who has ruled the election bill ineligible for a simple-majority vote. When allies tried slipping the bill into an immigration funding package earlier this month, it collapsed 48-50, losing four Republicans.
"The only way you could get there is to undo or get rid of the legislative filibuster, and there aren't even close to the votes here," Thune told reporters, adding that Republicans would need to elect more senators to make it happen.
On Monday, senators arrived at the Capitol for afternoon votes with no briefing on an emerging Iran deal Trump had announced. They spent hours dodging reporter questions while waiting for White House talking points to arrive that evening. Even Thune appeared left out of the loop. "We haven't seen anything yet," he said Tuesday morning about the Iran memorandum of understanding, despite Trump announcing the 60-day ceasefire days earlier.
The White House released a statement defending its track record: "The White House and President Trump have enjoyed working closely with Leader Thune and Senate Republicans to deliver on many important promises to the American people, including the largest tax cut for working Americans in history, and the Secure America Act that fully funds the President's border security agenda."
Some rank-and-file Trump loyalists are ducking the fight altogether. "I don't get caught up in, like, the palace intrigue," said Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri. "They tend to generally work themselves out."
When asked if he sympathizes with Thune's position, Cornyn reframed the problem: "It's not about sympathy; it's about basically being able to function. I think part of the problem is not President Trump, it's us making unrealistic promises."
Even Trump's staunchest backers are losing confidence in the method. Senator Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming said Thune speaks for the Republican caucus and that nobody is plotting to replace him. She backed Thune's candor in telling Trump the votes simply do not exist. "He should be as frank as he's being," Lummis said. "My favorite saying: Tell the truth; it's easier to remember."
Author Sarah Mitchell: "Trump is treating the Senate like a political prop rather than a co-equal branch with its own constraints, and that's a recipe for legislative gridlock disguised as leadership."
Comments