Across diners, farmyards, and town halls from Michigan to Arizona, Democratic primary candidates are hearing the same refrain: voters are exhausted with both parties and skeptical the Democrats can deliver. As the party reels from its 2024 presidential defeat, internal divisions over strategy threaten to undermine what polls suggest could be a strong midterm performance.
The Democratic National Committee released a post-election autopsy months late, only to face criticism for what it omitted. Joe Biden's age, central to his decision to abandon the race in July 2024, went unaddressed. The Gaza war, which fractured the party's left wing, received no serious analysis. The result has left many Democrats feeling their leadership hasn't grasped the scale of the problem.
Ken Martin, the DNC chair, acknowledged the party brand "is in trouble," noting that Democratic policy positions often poll well in places where Democratic candidates lose. The challenge now is whether midterm gains can mask deeper structural decay.
Candidates nationwide report voters aren't fixated on party messaging or autopsy reports. They want action on healthcare, housing affordability, immigration enforcement, education, war, gas prices, job protection from artificial intelligence, and climate change. When Democrats seem absent from these fights, voters turf them out.
"It's less about the bickering amongst Democrats and more about folks feeling like there are fewer people who give a shit in politics," said Francesca Hong, running for governor in Wisconsin.
The party faces a strategic split. Some candidates are pursuing a moderate lane, betting on independents and disaffected Republicans. Others have embraced left-wing populism, arguing the party has abandoned the working class. Few agree on which path works.
Mallory McMorrow, a Michigan state legislator running for U.S. Senate, recently sat down with Trump voters in a swing county to understand their motivations. One man said he backed Trump to disrupt the system and create jobs. When McMorrow pointed out Trump had fallen short, the man's response was blunt: nobody in Washington understands his struggle.
"I just don't want Democrats to take for granted that Republicans are giving us every opportunity, but we got to be aggressive, we got to fight, and we got to fight for people and make some people uncomfortable," McMorrow said.
State lawmakers and local party leaders are attempting to rebuild in rural, red-leaning areas long written off by national Democrats. Curtis Hertel Jr., chair of the Michigan Democratic Party, walked in a small-town mushroom festival in a deep-red county expecting ridicule. Instead, residents were thrilled a Democrat showed up to listen.
"They told me I was going to get yelled at and spit on," Hertel said. "People were actually excited that a Democrat was actually showing up to have a conversation."
The absence of national Democratic investment in these areas has cost the party dearly. For years, strategists like Jane Kleeb, chair of the Nebraska Democratic Party, have argued for sustained ground presence. Instead, the party concentrated resources on seven to ten swing states, with national messaging tilted toward coastal audiences.
Chris Rabb, a Philadelphia state lawmaker who won his primary in the bluest district in the country, frames the midterms as a referendum on establishment politics itself. Voters worry about another repeat of John Fetterman, the Pennsylvania senator who campaigned as a progressive populist only to govern more conservatively.
"They felt betrayed by someone who was cosplaying as a populist," Rabb said. "They want to know, how do we know you're not going to break our heart?"
In Arizona's swing districts, Democratic consultants say voters simply want government that functions. "Folks are frustrated with this system, and the parties are the system," said Stacy Pearson, a Democratic strategist. "What we find is that, particularly Democrats in Arizona, who are a minority, just want sanity."
Rebecca Cooke, running again in western Wisconsin to unseat Republican Derrick Van Orden, learned early that introducing herself as a Democrat triggers immediate dismissal. When she leads with her background and values, voters listen. They're tired of what one described as "limousine liberals and caviar conservatives." They want a roadmap showing what a Democratic House majority would actually do.
Abbas Alawieh, a leader in the uncommitted movement that pushed for a Gaza ceasefire, is now running for Michigan state senate. He views the DNC autopsy's failure to address war as proof the party is "out of touch with where voters are."
Abdul El-Sayed, a public health official running for U.S. Senate in Michigan, sees the same pattern. "These are the issues that keep people up at night, and they feel like the party is just completely absent from the playing field," he said.
Rob Flaherty, who worked on Biden's and Kamala Harris's campaigns, offered a blunt assessment in his own autopsy: Democrats will likely win the House and possibly the Senate this year, but those victories would "paper over" a fundamental problem. The party still speaks to people who believe institutions work, not the multiracial working class that once formed its backbone.
Whether Democrats can rebuild that coalition before the next presidential race remains the central question. Midterm gains could mask the problem, or they could provide a platform for restructuring. For now, candidates are improvising on the ground while party leadership struggles to articulate a coherent vision.
Author James Rodriguez: "Democrats are right to sense opportunity in Trump's unpopularity, but chasing midterm wins without answering the core question of what the party actually stands for is a recipe for another presidential blowout."
Comments