Republican Senator Dan Sullivan is fighting on two fronts in his reelection bid: against Democrat Mary Peltola and now against a namesake with an "R" next to his name on the ballot.
The senator's campaign has leveled extraordinary accusations, claiming that Peltola and national Democrats orchestrated the recruitment of Dan Sullivan (middle initial J), an elementary school teacher and cancer survivor, specifically to siphon votes and confuse voters in Alaska's August 18 primary.
"Mary Peltola and D.C. Democrats know they can't win this race on the issues, so they've resorted to dirty, dishonest tactics," said Nate Adams, Sullivan's campaign spokesman. "They've recruited a sham candidate with the sole purpose of deceiving voters and manipulating Alaska's election system."
The timing is sharp. The other Sullivan announced his Senate campaign last week, immediately becoming a complication in a three-way contest for what could be one of the nation's most competitive Senate seats. Sullivan is seeking his third term.
The similarities are striking enough to fuel the accusations. Both are registered Republicans. Both campaign logos rely on navy, white, and yellow color schemes with star imagery. The senator's middle initial is S.; his challenger's is J.
The other Sullivan, however, is running a straightforward campaign message: that the incumbent "has failed to put Alaska first." He has not publicly acknowledged any connection to Peltola's operation.
Peltola, who served in the House from 2023 to 2025, is the frontrunner among Democratic candidates. Her campaign denies involvement. "We have no involvement with either Sullivan campaign," said Harry Child, her spokesman.
The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has not responded to inquiries about the allegations.
Alaska's ranked-choice voting system adds another layer to the intrigue. The top four finishers in the primary, regardless of party, advance to November's general election. That mechanic gives the state's unusual electoral structure genuine strategic importance. A crowded field could fracture the Republican vote, potentially benefiting Peltola.
Sullivan's campaign is considering legal options. Adams said the team is "reviewing all of our options and aren't ruling anything out." The accusation that a candidate was recruited specifically to serve as a spoiler is incendiary in any race, but especially in Alaska, where the state's primary system already confuses some voters.
The two Sullivans are not to be confused with Dan Sullivan, Anchorage's mayor, who is not running for Senate.
Author Sarah Mitchell: "This story has all the hallmarks of modern campaign warfare, but the 'same-name spoiler' gambit is genuinely novel, and if the recruitment claim holds water, it could reshape how parties approach primary engineering in ranked-choice states."
Comments