A shooting at a mosque and school in San Diego last week killed three people and forced Muslim Americans to confront a grim reality: places of worship are no longer guaranteed safe. Jewish communities are asking the same questions after recent stabbings in London, wondering if their children can attend school unmolested and whether they can walk city streets without fear of violence tied to their identity.
For years, these two hatreds have been treated as separate crises. Over the past three years, antisemitism and anti-Muslim hate have both reached record levels across the West, yet political and civic leaders rarely acknowledge them as interconnected threats or part of a larger pattern of extremism targeting religious minorities.
The landscape has shifted dramatically. Days before the San Diego attack, tens of thousands gathered in London behind Tommy Robinson, a far-right agitator who called for "remigration" of Muslims from Britain. Across Western democracies, support for far-right movements has surged, making hostility toward Islam and Muslims central to their political platforms. When Muslims gathered to pray in London's Trafalgar Square in March during Ramadan, Conservative politicians condemned the gathering as "intimidation" and "domination," language that would have been unthinkable directed at Christian or Jewish religious observance.
The violence targeting Muslims stems from decades of demonization: Islam portrayed in media, politics, and popular culture as backward and inherently violent. Muslims themselves are cast as people whose values are incompatible with the West, framed as demographic and cultural threats to white Christian majorities.
Antisemitism operates differently but shares similar conspiracy machinery. Ancient libels claim Jews secretly control governments, banks, media, and courts through hidden power networks. George Soros, a Holocaust survivor, has become a lightning rod for these attacks, with conspiracy theories alleging that his philanthropic work is a plot to destabilize societies. These theories led directly to violence: a pipe bomb sent to Soros's home in 2018 and the 2018 shooting at Pittsburgh's Tree of Life synagogue.
The two hatreds increasingly merge in a single conspiracy framework. The "great replacement theory," popularized by French polemicist Renaud Camus, imagines a conspiratorial elite replacing white populations with non-white immigrants, particularly Muslims. The theory uses "replacist elites" as coded language for Jews. White nationalists in Charlottesville in 2017 chanted "Jews will not replace us," fusing both hatreds into one narrative. Political figures like Nigel Farage have accused Soros of encouraging Muslim migration to "flood Europe," constructing a single enemy narrative that requires both Muslims to fear and Jews to blame.
The parallels to historical xenophobia are striking. Early 20th century anti-immigration campaigns in Britain and America, including the 1905 Aliens Act, explicitly targeted Jews fleeing persecution in Eastern Europe. Legislation was justified by describing Jewish people as "a race apart" and warning of an "intolerable invasion." Far-right groups marched into neighborhoods claiming Muslims were stealing jobs. The same script has been recycled across centuries.
Today, political leaders intentionally pit these communities against each other. When Zohran Mamdani campaigned to become New York City's first Muslim mayor, attacks on his identity were often framed as concern for Jewish safety. Germany's chancellor has claimed antisemitism was "imported" by migrants, erasing his nation's own history. France's Marine Le Pen, whose party has antisemitic roots, positions her National Rally as a protector of Jews against "Islamist ideology." Each frames the safety of one community as requiring fear of the other.
The wars in Gaza, Lebanon, and Iran have deepened these divisions since October 2023. Jewish people face blame for Israeli government actions; Muslims face collective responsibility for Hamas and other armed groups. Legitimate criticism of states and governments must remain possible, but holding entire peoples accountable for the actions of extremists is a trap that fuels both hatreds.
Yet resistance to this poisoned logic exists. Jewish communities in San Diego were among the first to condemn the mosque shooting and stand with Muslims. After the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre, Muslim Americans raised funds for grieving Jewish congregants. When a gunman attacked a Hanukkah gathering at Sydney's Bondi Beach, a Syrian-born Muslim, Ahmed al-Ahmed, ran at the attacker and wrestled his weapon away. These moments reveal how defending one community strengthens rather than weakens the defense of all communities.
If these hatreds rise together, feeding shared conspiracy theories and a politics of fear, they cannot be defeated separately. Trading the safety of one community for the rejection of another is a false bargain that leaves everyone vulnerable. Today's threats to Muslims and Jews will become tomorrow's threats to other groups. The only way forward is solidarity, and the only way an open society survives is by defending itself together.
Author James Rodriguez: "The real story here isn't just that two separate hatreds exist, it's that extremists have figured out how to weaponize both at once, which makes breaking them apart nearly impossible without understanding how they feed each other."
Comments