Kevin Warsh stepped into the Federal Reserve's top job this week facing an economy that resists easy solutions. Inflation sits stubbornly above target after five years of elevated prices. A Middle East energy shock is rippling through supply chains. And the labor market, once Warsh's predecessor's chief concern, now appears to be stabilizing on its own.
The new Fed chair was sworn in Friday at the White House, where President Trump delivered an unexpected message: independence matters more than fealty.
"Honestly, I really mean this: I want Kevin to be totally independent and just do a great job. Don't look at me, don't look at anybody. Just do your own thing and do a great job," Trump said. The statement marked a sharp pivot from the relentless public pressure the president applied to Jerome Powell, Warsh's predecessor, to slash interest rates.
Warsh responded by framing his mandate in broad terms. "Our mandate at the Fed is to promote price stability and maximum employment," he said. "When we pursue those aims with wisdom and clarity, independence and resolve, inflation can be lower, growth stronger, real take-home pay higher, and America can be more prosperous."
The new Fed chair promised to lead "a reform-oriented Federal Reserve, learning from past successes and mistakes, both escaping static frameworks and models, and upholding clear standards of integrity and performance."
Warsh faces more explicit political pressure to cut rates than any recent Fed chair. Yet the economic case for lower rates has weakened considerably since his confirmation.
The Hawkish Pivot
Days before Warsh's swearing-in, Fed Governor Christopher Waller delivered a speech that signaled a hardening consensus on the policy committee. Not long ago, Waller was among the most vocal advocates for rate cuts to support an allegedly weakening labor market.
That argument has collapsed. Waller's speech, titled "Policy Risks Have Changed," documented his complete reversal.
The Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the personal consumption expenditures index, ran at roughly 3.8 percent in April compared with a year earlier, the highest level in three years. Core PCE, which strips out volatile food and energy, stood at around 3.3 percent. Both figures sit well above the Fed's 2 percent target.
"Inflation is not headed in the right direction," Waller said plainly.
He also noted that the labor market appears to be stabilizing, removing the justification he once leaned on for supporting rate cuts. "I am going to need to see improvement on inflation or a significant deterioration in the labor market before I would consider reducing the policy rate," he said.
Waller stopped short of calling for immediate rate increases, acknowledging that the lagged effects of monetary policy could harm growth if the energy shock from Middle East tensions subsides. But he opened the door to future hikes.
"I can no longer rule out rate hikes further down the road if inflation does not abate soon, and that is especially true if measures of inflation expectations, some of which have risen lately, show signs of becoming unanchored," he said.
Early warning signs are flashing. Consumers appear to be adjusting their long-run inflation expectations higher, a development that keeps Fed officials awake at night. Once inflation expectations shift, they become self-fulfilling.
The Coin Flip Problem
Waller offered a useful metaphor for why the current inflation pattern is so troubling. If you flip a coin and get heads three times in a row, you start to wonder if the coin is rigged, even though you know each flip should be independent events.
The economy faces a similar dynamic. Americans have endured a parade of price shocks over the past several years. Each one individually might fade. But when they stack up, people rationally begin to assume higher inflation is the new baseline. That shift in expectations, once it takes hold, makes bringing inflation down materially harder.
This is Warsh's central problem. The Fed has missed its inflation target for five years. That track record makes the current energy shock harder to dismiss as temporary. Waller warned that the succession of shocks could convince consumers and businesses to permanently revise up their inflation forecasts.
The current policy stance may already be too loose for these conditions. With growth solid, the labor market stabilizing, inflation accelerating, and fiscal stimulus still supporting demand, some analysts question whether the Fed cut rates too aggressively last year under the guise of "insurance."
Deutsche Bank economists Matthew Luzzetti and Matthew Raskin flagged the imbalance. "With growth solid, the labor market showing increasing signs of stabilization, inflation accelerating and fiscal policy and financial conditions supportive, the Fed's policy stance might be miscalibrated," they wrote.
Trump's Friday comment, whatever his intentions, handed Warsh political cover to maintain or raise rates without appearing to defy the president. Whether Warsh can actually achieve his stated goal of durably lower inflation without triggering a growth shock remains the open question hanging over the Fed's next chapter.
Author James Rodriguez: "Warsh walked into a job where doing nothing looks riskier than action, and Trump just gave him permission to ignore the usual political pressures."
Comments