A federal judge offered little indication Tuesday that he would order construction work halted on the Reflecting Pool, casting doubt on efforts to block President Trump's rapid renovation of the iconic Washington landmark.
Judge Carl J. Nichols appeared unconvinced that the alterations being made would cause permanent damage if he later determined them to be unlawful. That skepticism could prove decisive in determining whether work proceeds uninterrupted while legal challenges wind through the courts.
The Reflecting Pool, stretched across the National Mall between the Lincoln Memorial and the Washington Monument, has been at the center of competing visions for how the nation's capital should present itself. Trump administration officials have moved swiftly to implement design changes that supporters say will modernize the space while critics argue disrupt a historic vista.
Lawyers opposing the work had sought an emergency injunction to stop construction, arguing the changes needed time for proper environmental and historical review. But Nichols' questions during the hearing suggested he was not persuaded that halting the project was necessary to preserve his ability to grant meaningful relief later if the plaintiffs ultimately prevail in their lawsuit.
The judge's apparent leanings represent a significant procedural hurdle for those seeking to block the renovation. Even when courts find agency action unlawful, they often allow projects to continue if reversal is possible. Nichols' focus on whether the pool's changes could be undone if deemed illegal suggested he saw little reason to impose a freeze on the work while the case proceeded.
No immediate ruling was announced following the hearing.
Author Sarah Mitchell: "When a judge starts asking whether damage is really permanent, it usually means the excavators keep moving."
Comments