Steve Cohen, a 19-term congressman from Memphis, did not lose an election. He was not forced out by voters or scandal. A single stroke of a pen ended his career in Congress when Tennessee's Republican-led legislature redrew his district, carving up the Black voters who had formed the core of his constituency.
The new electoral map divides Cohen's ninth district into three pieces, folding a significant portion of his Black constituents into Williamson County to the south. "Last week Tennessee Republicans silenced the Black vote here in Memphis to make Republican victories likely," Cohen said in a statement.
The timing is not coincidental. This week, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted key protections of the Voting Rights Act in a 6-3 ruling that weakened federal oversight of electoral maps. The decision has triggered a cascade of redistricting efforts across Republican-controlled states, each designed to eliminate or dilute Black-majority districts.
Louisiana plans to eliminate one of its two Black-majority districts. Alabama has already erased one of its two. In Mississippi, state legislators are openly discussing eliminating the district of Bennie Thompson, the state's only Black congressman from a state where 38 percent of the population is Black. Thompson, 78, also chaired the House investigation into January 6.
"It was time to erase Bennie Thompson's district," a Mississippi Republican state senator said this week. Governor Tate Reeves, who designates April as Confederate Heritage Month, vowed that Thompson's "reign of terror" would soon end.
The scope of the threat is staggering. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said recently that 19 of the caucus's 62 members face elimination through the 2028 election cycle. Nearly a third of Black members of Congress are now at risk. The nation went from 13 Black members in 1971 to 62 today. In a matter of months, that achievement is being methodically unwound.
There is a familiar pattern here. In 1913, President Woodrow Wilson's administration resegregated the federal civil service that Reconstruction had opened. They did it through executive action and administrative memo, lunchroom by lunchroom, with no formal proclamation naming the project. The most consequential racial reordering of the early 20th century happened through paperwork.
Between 1900 and 1903, Black voting in Alabama collapsed from 180,000 to fewer than 3,000, made possible by a state constitution that gave county registrars administrative discretion. White men could vote without recommendation. Black men required a white voucher. After George Henry White left office in 1901, no Black American was elected to Congress for 27 years.
The architects of that system did not call it apartheid. They called it "states' rights" and "reform." Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld segregation, lasted 58 years longer than the presidents who appointed its justices. The Jim Crow settlement, built between 1877 and 1896, endured nearly nine decades. These were generational projects, and they succeeded because their architects were not building for a midterm.
Modern Republicans are adopting the same logic. In Tennessee, the speaker of the House stripped Democratic legislators of committee assignments for blocking aisles, interlocking arms, and distributing earplugs to a colleague. Other red states will recognize the template and use it. The precedent is being set now.
Meanwhile, Democratic leaders gathered in Toronto this week to discuss messaging on groceries and housing. But no housing message will stop a party determined to erase representation itself. No affordability strategy will preserve electoral maps from dismantling. By the next census, these rules will be in place. By the time a Democratic president takes office, Republican appointees will control the federal courts reviewing that presidency.
The question being posed to Democrats is whether they understand what is actually happening. Republicans are not trying to win the next election fairly. They are working to make November cease to matter by erasing the voters and districts that oppose them. It is a structural project, not a tactical one, and it has already begun.
Author James Rodriguez: "This isn't just about one election or one map. It's about whether American democracy can survive a systematic effort to rewrite the electoral architecture itself."
Comments