The seventh congressional district in Pennsylvania is one of the nation's most fiercely contested battlegrounds. Democrat Susan Wild lost her last reelection bid by a single percentage point, separated from Republican Ryan Mackenzie by just over 4,000 votes. This week's primary will test whether the Democratic party is ready to bet on working-class authenticity or double down on credentialed insiders.
Allentown sits at the heart of this fight. The city has become shorthand for post-industrial America: once home to thriving manufacturing, the region now struggles with the aftermath of massive job losses. Neighboring Bethlehem's storied steel mills, which operated at world-scale capacity, closed in 2003 and were replaced by a casino. It is precisely the kind of place where national elections are won or lost.
The Democratic primary here pits three establishment figures against an outsider with a starkly different message. Lamont McClure Jr. served two terms as Northampton County executive and is a lawyer who frequently reminds voters he is the only candidate with prior elected office. Carol Obando-Derstine worked as a top renewable energy engineer and later as a nonprofit executive, having previously served as a senior Latino affairs adviser to US Senator Bob Casey. Ryan Crosswell, also an attorney and former Republican, prosecuted cases in the Obama administration's Department of Justice.
These are the kind of candidates Democrats routinely nominate in swing districts like this one. And these are the kind who routinely lose.
The Populist Alternative
Enter Bob Brooks, a firefighter and head of the statewide firefighters union. Brooks was raised by a single mother who worked as a bartender, and his grandfather was a Teamster truck driver. He never attended college. Today he coaches varsity baseball at Nazareth High School while running a lawn care business from his Chevy diesel work truck.
His campaign is unabashedly populist. "The Democratic Party has become the party of elites," Brooks has said. "Our politics are being bought and paid for, and we have to stop that. We've fought three wars since the minimum wage was last raised."
The demographic math of the district explains why this message resonates. Only 33 percent of voters in the seventh district hold a college degree, a full 10 points below the national average. Manufacturing employs roughly 38,000 workers in the area. Warehousing and trucking account for another 27,000 jobs. Construction brings in 12,000 more. Contrast that with approximately 14,000 professional-class positions, and the picture becomes clear: blue-collar workers vastly outnumber the credentialed elite.
Working-class voters have consistently preferred candidates who share their lived experience over those who merely claim expertise. An electrician or schoolteacher speaks the language of actual economic struggle in ways that lawyers and nonprofit executives often cannot. Brooks has built his platform on issues that resonate directly with this reality: Medicare for All, labor law reform, infrastructure investment, raising the minimum wage, and repealing Citizens United.
What makes his candidacy truly unusual is the breadth of his support across fractious Democratic factions. He has secured endorsements from Governor Josh Shapiro and US Senator Bernie Sanders. Representatives Chris Deluzio and Madeleine Dean back him. So do Elizabeth Warren and Ruben Gallego. He has won backing from both the ultra-progressive Working Families Party and the moderate Blue Dog PAC.
This coalition points to something larger than a simple clash between progressives and moderates. The Democratic party's core challenge is not policy disagreement but rather a fundamental rupture with the working class. A growing concentration of college-educated, professional-class voters has shifted the party's center of gravity. These educated voters reward credentials and experience. In primary elections dominated by such voters, candidates who are lawyers, executives, and former government advisers flourish. In general elections, those same candidates often struggle to connect with voters whose lives revolve around hourly wages, shift work, and manual labor.
Brooks represents a different approach. Unlike many Democratic candidates who dismiss or condescend to working-class Trump voters, he speaks earnestly about winning them back. He supports border security and more resources for police and first responders. He avoids culture war traps. He understands that someone who pumps diesel fuel regularly gets the pain at the pump in ways others might not.
The Republican party is already spending heavily to shape this primary, a sign that party strategists view Brooks as a genuine threat in November. Whether Democratic primary voters agree remains to be seen.
Author James Rodriguez: "Brooks represents the working-class populism that could actually flip swing districts, which makes the Democratic establishment's attachment to credentialed insiders look less like principle and more like electoral malpractice."
Comments