Two Democratic powerhouses are locked in a quiet struggle for control of Bernie Sanders' political machinery, each tapping different wings of the Vermont senator's movement to fuel potential 2028 presidential runs. The split reveals a fundamental tension within American progressivism itself: how far left to go, and whether to make deals with ideological opponents.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez commands the dominant position. The New York congresswoman leads in early polling and enjoys a massive social media following that translates into small-dollar fundraising muscle. California Rep. Ro Khanna lags behind but has made a calculated bet: aggressively recruit the architects of Sanders' earlier campaigns, banking on institutional knowledge and operative networks to close the gap.
The strategic divergence between them mirrors the evolution of Sanders' own movement. Khanna has assembled what operatives now call the "Old Bernie" faction, populated with veterans from Sanders' 2016 campaign. He's brought aboard Jeff Weaver, Sanders' 2016 campaign manager, along with ad maker Julian Mulvey, former aide Shannon Jackson, and Sarah Michelsen, who directed Sanders' Nevada operation in 2020.
Ocasio-Cortez commands the "New Bernie" apparatus, staffed by strategists who shaped Sanders' more ideologically aggressive 2020 bid. Her team includes Mike Casca, Sanders' 2020 communications director, Oliver Hidalgo-Wohlleben, who handled delegates, and Matt Duss, Sanders' former top foreign policy strategist.
The philosophical differences between these camps have begun to crystallize in public view. Khanna has adopted positions marginally closer to the political center on crime and immigration. He explicitly rejected the "defund the police" mantra that Ocasio-Cortez championed. On immigration, he framed voters' 2024 support for Trump as rooted in desire for "lower prices and a secure border," a formulation that acknowledges border security as a legitimate concern.
Ocasio-Cortez countered by warning that Trump's immigration crackdown would devastate agricultural production, implicitly challenging the premise that immigration restrictions solve economic anxiety. The difference signals competing theories about how to reclaim working-class voters without abandoning progressive ideals.
Khanna has also cultivated relationships with constituencies traditionally hostile to progressives. He reached out to parents who lost family members to accidents involving undocumented immigrants, communities Trump's camp labels "angel families." That move, unthinkable for Ocasio-Cortez, reflects Khanna's calculation that progressives must compete for legitimacy on law-and-order issues.
The fault line erupted into public conflict last week when the two clashed over whether progressives should partner with Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican currently serving in the House. Greene has attracted unexpected praise from some progressives for criticizing Israel's Gaza war and breaking with Trump on certain issues.
Khanna has worked with Greene on efforts to release the Epstein files. Ocasio-Cortez explicitly rejected any alliance, declaring during an appearance with Democratic strategist David Axelrod that she refuses to trust "a proven bigot and antisemite" on Middle East policy, even if such figures occasionally align with progressive positions.
Khanna's response, delivered to Axios, signaled a different calculus. "I will not yield an inch when it comes to standing for progressive values and for the human rights of every person," he said. "But if conservatives are willing to support justice for Epstein survivors or stopping the war in Iran, I will work with them."
The Greene dispute hits particularly hard because she previously attacked Ocasio-Cortez directly, posting images of herself with a gun alongside progressive House members. That personal history appears to have foreclosed any possibility of collaboration from the AOC camp.
Khanna's recruitment blitz reflects pure necessity. Despite holding the same ideological real estate as Ocasio-Cortez, he operates at a significant disadvantage in early measurements of 2028 viability. His small-dollar donor base pales in comparison, and he lacks Ocasio-Cortez's digital dominance. Hiring Sanders' old guard became a strategic imperative to build credibility among progressive activists and insiders who shape primary outcomes.
Yet the two camps maintain professional cordiality. Operatives working for both acknowledged that they remain in contact and share overlapping networks. Some personnel, like Weaver and Casca, have worked for Sanders in different campaign cycles and maintain relationships across factional lines. Duss confirmed he speaks regularly with Khanna.
"The two teams like each other and have a lot of shared connections, given everyone is part of the progressive movement and pushing towards many of the same goals," a person with visibility into both operations said.
The rivalry extends beyond philosophy into personality. Khanna has shown a willingness to throw elbows that Ocasio-Cortez has largely avoided. His public criticism of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a fellow Democrat, suggests he's willing to wage internal warfare if it raises his national profile. Ocasio-Cortez has largely stayed above such infighting.
Both Democrats remain committed to core progressive commitments: wealth redistribution through taxation, Medicare for All, and higher minimum wages. But the paths to resurrect Sanders' movement split fundamentally on questions about immigration, crime, and tactical alliances with non-progressives. That schism will likely define the 2028 primary fight.
Author James Rodriguez: "Khanna's aggressive poaching of Sanders operatives shows real cunning, but raw talent doesn't overcome a three-point gap in name recognition and social media reach."
Comments