The campaign to remove books from American schools and libraries has transformed from scattered parental complaints into a coordinated, well-funded political assault. More than 23,000 book bans have been documented over the past five years, with the pace accelerating sharply since 2021.
The American Library Association reported that 4,235 unique titles faced censorship challenges during 2025 alone, the second-highest total since the organization began tracking bans more than three decades ago. Nine in ten challenges now come from organized activist groups and government officials, compared to 72 percent just a year earlier.
Authors themselves have become casualties of the movement. Maia Kobabe, whose memoir Gender Queer topped the list of challenged books for three consecutive years, recalls confronting challengers who openly admitted they had never read her work. "Many of the people who challenged my book would hold it up and say this book is inappropriate or it's pornography and then they would proudly say: I've never read it," Kobabe said from Santa Rosa, California.
The primary targets remain consistent: literature exploring LGBTQ+ identity and works by authors of color dominate the censorship lists. But a new dimension has emerged. A recent report from PEN America found that nonfiction bans have doubled, including attacks on history books, health materials, biographies and memoirs that examine activism and social movements.
Malinda Lo, a 51-year-old author whose coming-of-age novel Last Night at the Telegraph Club was banned after its 2021 publication, sees the pattern clearly. The book tells the story of a Chinese-American teenager discovering her lesbian identity in 1950s San Francisco. "Sexuality is part of her story and leaving it out would be dishonest," Lo explained from Cambridge, Massachusetts. "They're trying to narrow the worldview of young people today so that is why my book and so many LGBTQ+ books and books about people of color are being banned."
What distinguishes this moment from previous book challenges is the orchestration. Groups like Moms for Liberty, Citizens Defending Freedom and Utah Parents United operate with shared lists of targets, coordinating campaigns across school districts and states. Activists share information online, deploy coordinated challenges, and work directly with elected officials to codify bans into state law.
Kasey Meehan, director of the Freedom to Read program at PEN America, documented how these tactics have evolved. "We've seen the way in which those tactics have been adopted by governors and state legislatures and then adopted in language that is signed as state legislation," Meehan said. "Local efforts have become increasingly more sophisticated to then influence state policy, and then increasingly we see similar language mirrored in president Trump's executive orders."
The bad faith nature of many challenges is evident in their execution. Objectors frequently cite specific passages or words without context, often from books they have admittedly not read. Ali Velshi, a journalist hosting the Velshi Banned Book Club, observed that thousands of 2021 challenges used identical language because it was provided to complainants by organizing groups. "It all would refer to page 19 where the word 'penis' occurs or whatever the case is," Velshi noted, describing how challengers could cite a banned word but struggled to name the author.
The economic consequences for writers have been severe. School visits, historically a crucial income source for young adult authors, have evaporated for many who write about people of color or queer characters. Lo warned of a cascading effect: "If schools can't buy books, publishers aren't making money, they're not going to be as willing to acquire new titles that might be banned. It's basic economics."
This financial pressure threatens to breed self-censorship, with publishers and authors potentially softening or removing complex content to avoid backlash and financial ruin.
Librarians have become collateral damage in the culture war. They face public vilification, online harassment labeling them as predators, and in some cases, termination. Last month, Luanne James, the top librarian in Rutherford County, Tennessee, was fired for refusing to move over 130 books with LGBTQ+ themes to the adult section. Sam Helmick, president of the American Library Association, acknowledged the toll: "Nobody wants to be attacked for serving the public, but the second is we know what's at stake."
For Malinda Lo, an immigrant who fled China as a child to escape a regime that suppressed free speech, the current American trajectory feels darkly familiar. "America is not China at this point but there have been so many attacks on the first amendment over the past several years it's quite disturbing to me. I fear that we are well on our way to authoritarianism."
Author James Rodriguez: "This isn't about protecting kids from age-inappropriate content; it's about controlling what young people are allowed to think about identity, history, and themselves."
Comments