Voting rights organizations that spent decades fighting for majority-minority districts across the South are regrouping after the Supreme Court dismantled key protections of the Voting Rights Act this week, marking what advocates describe as a historic rollback of civil rights era gains.
The ruling gutted Section 2 of the VRA, which for decades allowed plaintiffs to challenge electoral maps drawn in racially discriminatory ways. Organizations that championed these legal battles say the defeat has forced them to reimagine where and how they'll pursue their mission.
"I think that it is deeply troubling that in 2026 that many of us have less rights than our grandparents had, and that becomes truer and truer every year," said Ashley K Shelton, CEO and president of Power Coalition for Equality and Justice, a Louisiana-based civic engagement organization and plaintiff in the case.
The Voting Rights Act itself emerged from bloodshed. In March 1965, roughly 600 voting rights marchers attempting to walk from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama, were attacked by law enforcement on the Edmund Pettus Bridge. The officers deployed tear gas, billy clubs, and other weapons in what became known as "Bloody Sunday." Congress passed the VRA just five weeks later, enshrining the 15th Amendment's voting protections in federal law for the first time.
The Supreme Court decision this week represents what advocates view as the unraveling of that achievement. Rather than accept defeat, voting rights groups are plotting a deliberate shift in tactics and geography.
"If section 2 gets weakened, you're going to see a shift towards a lot of state-level strategies," said Anneshia Hardy, executive director of Alabama Values, who predicted this pivot before the ruling. "You're going to see more localized litigation, deepened investment in on-the-ground organizing. The fight doesn't stop. It ultimately relocates."
Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi have already seen state-level voting rights acts proposed, according to Hardy. These moves were not accidental. They represent a deliberate hedge by advocates preparing for the weakening of federal protections.
"If section 2 is weakened, the states are going to become the primary terrain for both protection and contestation," Hardy said.
Shelton emphasized that her organization and others won't abandon their voter mobilization work simply because federal law has shifted. Instead, they're doubling down on coalition-building across state lines and preparing for a different battleground.
"I think the answer is for Black voters and other voters of color and voters that believe in a multiracial democracy have to show up en mass in the fall and elect a Congress that will restore our rights," Shelton said.
Hilary Harris Klein, senior counsel of voting rights at Southern Coalition for Social Justice, framed the moment as a regression rather than an endpoint. "We stand on the shoulders of giants, when you think about the civil rights movement and even the work before, from the mid-20th century," she said. "I think there will be a recognition that we are in a time of retrogression of minority rights."
Klein predicted that advocacy won't necessarily move out of courts entirely, but that courtrooms will no longer be the primary venue for the fight. "The fights might not be in court as much as they have been, but that doesn't mean that they will be over or anything will be abandoned. The fight for equal voting rights is going to absolutely continue. It just might be in a different venue," she said.
Advocates are drawing parallels to the Jim Crow era, where efforts to expand voting access were consistently portrayed as overreach. Hardy noted the historical pattern. "Any efforts to expand access and correct inequality have consistently been met with counterarguments that frame those efforts as unfair or excessive. History gives us those receipts," she said. "This is not new."
Author James Rodriguez: "These groups didn't fight for decades just to fold when federal law changed. Expect the real battle to unfold in statehouses and local precincts, where the grassroots power has always actually lived."
Comments