Tucker Carlson has spent the last decade as one of Donald Trump's most vocal boosters, but lately he sounds like a man in crisis. The former Fox News host has begun publicly declaring himself "tormented" by his previous support for the president, even apologizing on his podcast for "misleading people" about Trump. Political analysts are watching closely, convinced this dramatic reversal is less spiritual awakening and more strategic positioning.
Carlson's sudden contrition marks a notable fracture in the Make America Great Again movement at a moment when Trump's influence faces real constraints. In private messages revealed during the 2023 Fox-Dominion lawsuit, Carlson admitted he actually hated Trump, yet he continued championing him publicly at rallies and on television. His recent turn comes as his criticism of Israel policy and opposition to potential military action against Iran have put him at odds with the Trump administration's apparent direction.
What makes Carlson's repositioning significant is his platform and reach. He commanded Fox's highest-rated show before his abrupt 2023 departure and now runs his own media operation with more than 5 million YouTube followers. Prediction markets and political analysts have begun floating the possibility that Carlson is preparing for something far bigger than media commentary.
Jason Zengerle, a New Yorker writer who recently completed a biography of Carlson, told Poynter that the former host should be viewed as a movement leader rather than a traditional media figure. Zengerle believes an Iran conflict, particularly if it deteriorates, could position Carlson perfectly for a 2028 presidential run. "He can hang that war around JD Vance's neck, around Marco Rubio's neck," Zengerle said, "and say: 'I was against this from the start. I'm the true heir for Maga.'"
Scott Galloway, co-host of the Pivot podcast, shares this assessment. He explicitly stated last week that Carlson appears to be running for president, calling him "the most likely GOP nominee for president in 2028." Galloway suggested that on a debate stage, Carlson would outmaneuver both Vance and Rubio.
Carlson himself has been careful not to confirm such ambitions. In an interview with the Economist last month, he dismissed the presidential speculation, claiming politics feels "disgusting" to him and that coalition-building doesn't suit his temperament. He made similar denials to Piers Morgan, suggesting he lacks the stomach for electoral politics.
Yet the political landscape appears tailor-made for his potential emergence. Trump's brand has grown increasingly toxic as his second term unfolds. Both Vance and Rubio face vulnerability, with Vance struggling to distance himself from foreign policy decisions he may be unable to escape. Meanwhile, provisions of Trump's economic agenda take effect in 2027, including tax cuts for the wealthy and cuts to social services for lower-income Americans, a combination likely to generate public backlash.
Carlson has already demonstrated the ability to shift his messaging and market a version of right-wing populism distinct from Trump's. An economically disillusioned electorate, faced with visible deterioration in living standards and angry about military entanglements, could find his anti-establishment critique appealing. His recent apology tour positions him as someone willing to acknowledge past mistakes, a contrast to Trump's approach.
Author James Rodriguez: "Carlson's sudden contrition reeks of calculation, not conscience, but that doesn't make his political threat any less real."
Comments