GOP splinters over Trump's 400 million ballroom plan

GOP splinters over Trump's 400 million ballroom plan

The security breach at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner has triggered a sharp divide among congressional Republicans over how to fund a proposed 90,000-square-foot ballroom on the White House grounds.

Three Republican senators introduced legislation Monday to allocate $400 million for the project. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Katie Britt of Alabama, and Eric Schmitt of Missouri framed the initiative as a national security necessity rather than a Trump preference. "This is not about Trump. It's about the presidency of the United States," Graham said. "It's about the person who occupies that office not being put at risk if they choose to go off campus."

The proposal includes military infrastructure and a Secret Service annex beneath the structure. Graham suggested offsetting some costs through "custom fees" while reserving certain amenities for private donations. "Private donations can be used, but I think they should be used for buying china and stuff like that," he said.

But the party's spending hawks are pushing back. Senator Rick Scott of Florida, despite his Trump loyalty, questioned why taxpayers should bear the cost. "I don't know why you would do it if it's all funded," Scott told reporters, pointing to the nation's $39 trillion debt. "Maybe we ought to stop spending money."

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky echoed the sentiment, saying Trump has already raised money through private means. "I'm not for funding the whole $500 million," Paul said. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri raised a separate concern about congressional authority to approve major White House reconstruction, though he also prefers private funding to avoid putting "the taxpayer on the hook."

Democrats are uniformly opposed. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii acknowledged the security incident but rejected the ballroom premise. "Private events happen outside of the White House, and so we can't be a society where there's no public events and everything happens in a reinforced ballroom," he said. "I haven't found any Democrat who says yes." Democrats also argue Trump violated the law by demolishing the East Wing without congressional approval and contend that private funding creates corruption risks.

Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania stands alone among Democrats in supporting the project, suggesting Sunday that opponents suffer from "Trump derangement syndrome," though he did not specify whether he backs public or private funding.

Passage faces steep odds. The legislation would need 60 Senate votes, a threshold Republicans cannot reach without Democratic support. Graham said he prefers the regular legislative process but remains open to bundling the ballroom into a party-line bill if necessary, though Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed uncertainty about whether reconciliation rules would allow such a maneuver.

The push follows Saturday's shooting at the Washington Hilton, where Cole Tomas Allen, a 31-year-old California teacher and engineer, breached a security checkpoint armed with a shotgun, handgun, and knives. Federal prosecutors charged him Monday with attempting to assassinate Trump. Law enforcement prevented him from reaching the ballroom where the president, Vice President JD Vance, Speaker Mike Johnson, and other officials were seated. Authorities said Allen had sent family members a note indicating his intention to target Trump administration figures.

White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt, who was sitting at the head table during the shooting, called the ballroom "critical for our national security," arguing that high-ranking officials should be able to gather "free and safely." Johnson echoed that sentiment, saying the incident demonstrates the need for a secure facility.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries dismissed the project as a "vanity project" resulting from unauthorized demolition of the East Wing, urging Congress to prioritize other national security concerns and efforts to reduce the cost of living.

Author Sarah Mitchell: "Graham's right that Republicans should get a vote, but his party's deepening fault line over government spending suggests the ballroom won't get anywhere near 60 votes."

Comments